Yes! As part of this consultation, we are offering the option to achieve provider status in CBT for Nightmares. Provider status requirements include:
1. Complete training
2. Attend and actively participate in a minimum of 10 calls
3. Complete to treatment fidelity a minimum of 3 individual cases, 2 groups, or a combination of both
4. A part of each main component of treatment (e.g., sleep habit review, introducing theories of nightmares, exposure, rescripting, and relaxation training must be demonstrated on a recording in order of the consultant to determine that you have mastered the skill.
There is limited research examining CBT-N among adolescents and children. However, a treatment manual has been developed and tested.
Cromer, L., Bell, S. B., Prince, L. E., Hollman, N., El Sabbagh, E., & Buck, T. Efficacy of a telehealth cognitive behavioral therapy for improving sleep and nightmares in children aged 6-17. Frontiers in Sleep, 3, 1401023.
Stay tuned! We plan to add a module on treating nightmares in children and adolescents in 2025!
Some patient populations have difficulty with the instructions of stimulus control that require them to get out of bed when they are not sleepy or asleep during the night. For example, hospitalized inpatients, individuals with Parkinson's’ or other movement disorders, older adults, and individuals with chronic pain may struggle with these instructions or be unable to implement them. In this case, we recommend an alternative approach called “counter control,” which has the same goal and largely achieves the same effects as stimulus control.
In counter control, the patient is instructed to follow the same 15-minute rule of stimulus control. However, instead of getting out of bed after 15 minutes of wakefulness in bed, the patient instead changes the context of their in-bed experience. The goal is to remove sleep effort from the bed—that is, to stop trying to sleep. To achieve this, it is helpful to make some changes to the sleep environment and bed when counter control is being enacted. Depending on the patient’s individual limitations, this could mean switching on a dim light and sitting up against some pillows. Alternatively, a patient could move so that they are laying horizontally on the bed, or put their head at the opposite end than the one they typically use. It may be helpful to encourage the patient to think of two different “modes” that they can be in while in bed – either “sleep mode,” in which they are in their typical sleep position, with lights off, or in “wake mode” in which they change their situations and cues while in bed, and are NOT aiming to fall asleep. Though it may seem counterintuitive given what we prescribe in stimulus control to ask patients to engage in activities other than sleep and sex in the bed, considering the underlying rationale of stimulus control helps to resolve this paradox. We are helping the patient to associate certain cues (“sleep mode”) with sleep, and certain cues (“wake mode”) with wake. Just like in stimulus control, if the patient begins to feel sleepy while in “wake mode,” they should transition back to “sleep mode.” If unable to sleep while in “sleep mode,” they should again follow the 15-minute rule as many times as necessary.
The limited research on counter control suggests it may be equally or somewhat less effective compared to stimulus control. A 1979 study by Zwart and Lisman demonstrated among 47 undergraduates, stimulus control and counter control both experienced improved sleep to a similar extent. A study by Davies and Colleagues (1986) revealed 74% of individuals with sleep maintenance insomnia who were treated with counter control did significantly reduce their wake after sleep onset by an average of 30%. However, the authors note that this magnitude of effect is somewhat attenuated compared to their prior studies of stimulus control.
Ultimately, the choice of whether to use stimulus control or counter control will likely be dictated by the individual patient’s needs. If possible, we recommend starting with stimulus control given the stronger research based. However, if stimulus control is not possible with your patient, then the next best course of action is likely counter control.Some patient populations have difficulty with the instructions of stimulus control that require them to get out of bed when they are not sleepy or asleep during the night. For example, hospitalized inpatients, individuals with Parkinson's’ or other movement disorders, older adults, and individuals with chronic pain may struggle with these instructions or be unable to implement them. In this case, we recommend an alternative approach called “counter control,” which has the same goal and largely achieves the same effects as stimulus control.
In counter control, the patient is instructed to follow the same 15-minute rule of stimulus control. However, instead of getting out of bed after 15 minutes of wakefulness in bed, the patient instead changes the context of their in-bed experience. The goal is to remove sleep effort from the bed—that is, to stop trying to sleep. To achieve this, it is helpful to make some changes to the sleep environment and bed when counter control is being enacted. Depending on the patient’s individual limitations, this could mean switching on a dim light and sitting up against some pillows. Alternatively, a patient could move so that they are laying horizontally on the bed, or put their head at the opposite end than the one they typically use. It may be helpful to encourage the patient to think of two different “modes” that they can be in while in bed – either “sleep mode,” in which they are in their typical sleep position, with lights off, or in “wake mode” in which they change their situations and cues while in bed, and are NOT aiming to fall asleep. Though it may seem counterintuitive given what we prescribe in stimulus control to ask patients to engage in activities other than sleep and sex in the bed, considering the underlying rationale of stimulus control helps to resolve this paradox. We are helping the patient to associate certain cues (“sleep mode”) with sleep, and certain cues (“wake mode”) with wake. Just like in stimulus control, if the patient begins to feel sleepy while in “wake mode,” they should transition back to “sleep mode.” If unable to sleep while in “sleep mode,” they should again follow the 15-minute rule as many times as necessary.
The limited research on counter control suggests it may be equally or somewhat less effective compared to stimulus control. A 1979 study by Zwart and Lisman demonstrated among 47 undergraduates, stimulus control and counter control both experienced improved sleep to a similar extent. A study by Davies and Colleagues (1986) revealed 74% of individuals with sleep maintenance insomnia who were treated with counter control did significantly reduce their wake after sleep onset by an average of 30%. However, the authors note that this magnitude of effect is somewhat attenuated compared to their prior studies of stimulus control.
Ultimately, the choice of whether to use stimulus control or counter control will likely be dictated by the individual patient’s needs. If possible, we recommend starting with stimulus control given the stronger research based. However, if stimulus control is not possible with your patient, then the next best course of action is likely counter control.
CBTNightmaresweb and the resulting CE credits offered upon completion of the course are completely free! Simply register to get started!
6.5 Continuing Education (CE) credits for psychologists and some other allied health and mental health professionals for the completion of this training. This program is co-sponsored with The Medical University of South Carolina’s Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Office of Continuing Education. The Medical University of South Carolina’s Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Office of Continuing Education is approved by the American Psychological Association to sponsor continuing education for psychologists.
The Medical University of South Carolina’s Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Office of Continuing Education maintains responsibility for this program and its content. Credit inquiries contact: psych-events@musc.edu or +1(843)792-9113.
If you are unsure if CEs co-sponsored by the American Psychological Association are acceptable for your licensure it is best to inquire with your local board as this can vary by state/territory.
Once the course has been completed and the final post-test has been passed, you will be able to print your personalized CE certificate for your records.
CBTNightmaresweb is designed to take 6.5 hours. However, it is a self-paced training and some find it takes more time and others will take less. Once you have registered, there is a "Modules" page that tells you the amount of "Required" and “Optional” times that each module (lesson) will take.
The videos are not able to be downloaded for copyright purposes, so they must be watched from the website.
If possible, trying on a different browser (e.g., Chrome instead of Safari) and/or device (e.g., laptop instead of tablet) can help resolve some issues that are occasionally experienced. If you are unable to switch or the switch does not remedy the problem please contact us via the Contact Us page or email us at cbtnightmaresweb@musc.edu. If you let us know what browser(s) and device(s) you are using we will be able to troubleshoot further.
This training was created with clinicians in mind, and we want to make sure we make it clear that it is only designed to help clinicians be minimally proficient in CBTN. True expertise requires further consultation and supervision. That being said, we have made the training freely available because we believe everyone can benefit from the concepts taught throughout the training, so please feel free to share with others who you think would find it useful.i
This work was supported by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs through the Peer Review Medical Research Program under Award No. W81XWH-21-1-0576 Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by the Department of Defense.